Legal Opinion

Glidden Co. v. The Vermont

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 8, 1942No. 16054PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This suit was brought by the libellant, the owner of a cargo of cocoanut oil, which was, at the port of Portland Oregon, loaded on board the Steamship “Vermont”, owned) by the claimant-respondent, California Eastern Line, Inc., to recover damages alleged to have been caused to said cargo by the contamination by mineral oil while in the pert and starboard deep tanks in hold No. 3 of the said S.S. “Vermont”.

Claimant-respondent denies the damages claimed, and alleges in the alternative that if there was any damage neither it nor the S.S. “Vermont” is responsible under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The RosaliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  2. Wessels v. the AsturiasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. The Steel InventorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
  4. The S. S. AsturiasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  5. The ArakanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co.(UK) v. SS Giovannella D'AmicoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. George F. Pettinos, Inc. v. American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. The VizcayaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API