Legal Opinion
The Vizcaya
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 11, 1945No. 45 of 1944PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
This is an action in admiralty brought by the consignee to recover for cargo damage allegedly sustained during the transatlantic voyage of the steamship Viz-caya. The issues involved are: (1) Whether the cargo was received by the Vizcaya in good order and condition, (2) if so, whether the damage was attributable to perils of the sea or to the unseaworthiness of the vessel, and (3) if the latter, whether due diligence was exercised to make the Vizcaya seaworthy.
The cargo in controversy consists of bags of shelled almonds and filberts marked “B. Co.” and “B.C.L.” which…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- The SouthwarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- The SilviaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The RosaliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Ceballos v. The Warren AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Swenson v. The Argonaut the Estelle. The SusanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Artemis Maritime Co., Inc. v. Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co., Inc. The DemosthenesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Complaint of Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Sanib Corporation v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- The NorteDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.