Legal Opinion
The Arakan
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 5, 1926No. 17865PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
In the present action libelant seeks a recovery for shortage in, and delivery in á contaminated and damaged condition of a portion of, a consignment of 864 tons of cocoanut oil, shipped from Cebu in the deep tank of claimant’s steamer Arakan in 1923. While on the voyage, certain of the after bulkhead rivets in this tank developed leaks, through which oil seeped into the double bottom tank and bilges. Most of that which escaped was recovered and salvaged, but, due both to contamination and the process of salvaging, only át a substantial loss.
Claimant’s initial position…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Carib PrinceSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The RosaliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Pendleton v. Benner LineSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- The Turret CrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Line v. PendletonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- United States v. Los Angeles Soap Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945
- The SchickshinnyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1942
- Glidden Co. v. The VermontDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.