Legal Opinion

United States v. Dearman

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 30, 1979No. CM 437773PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MITCHELL, Senior Judge:

The primary issue in this case is multiplicity. We are asked to decide whether the offenses of attempted rape and forcible sodomy (cunnilingus), both alleged to have occurred within the span of a few minutes and committed upon the same victim, were separately punishable.1 We say that they were.

I

On 4 August 1978 the dependent wife of an Army sergeant reported to the dispensary at Lee Barracks, Mainz, Germany, to begin her induction physical for entry into the U.S. Army. The accused, an x-ray technician, prepared her for a chest x-ray by directing her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. United States v. BurneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. HooperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. BeeneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. Lillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. JohnsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. BroussardU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. DelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. InghamU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API