Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Moscillo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 2, 1979No. A7612-17925, CA 10191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

In this personal injury case involving an automobile accident plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages from defendant. There was no claim of negligence on the part of the plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, but for compensatory damages only, and in a total amount of half of what she had claimed for medical expenses alone.

She makes four assignments of error on appeal. They resolve themselves into two basic contentions: (1) the trial court should have directed a verdict for the plaintiff; and (2) in connection with the claim for punitive damages it was error for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roshak v. LeathersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Baker County v. HuntingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Patterson v. SkoglundOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Shrock v. GoodellOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Payne v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Young v. CrookhamOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Young v. CrookhamOregon Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API