Legal Opinion

In re M.O.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 26, 2013No. A13-0774PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

This appeal is before a special term panel of this court to determine whether the notice of appeal was timely filed. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that the appeal is untimely and must be dismissed.

The appeal arises from competing petitions to adopt K.A.O., a five-year-old girl, and K.M.G., a two-year-old girl, for whom parental rights previously were terminated. Appellants M.O. and K.O. are the children’s maternal grandparents. Respondents W.G. and J.D. are K.M.G.’s paternal uncle and aunt. In December 2011, Morrison County placed the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. In Re the Welfare of J.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Welfare of the Child of R.K.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API