In re Welfare of the Child of R.K.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Dissent 1
DISSENT
2Dissent · GildeaGildea, Chief Justice
I respectfully dissent. Almost 20 years ago, the Minnesota Judicial Branch adopted the Children’s Justice Initiative, the goal of which is to ensure permanency for children in a fair and timely manner. See Minn. State Court Administrator’s Office, Minnesota Judges Juvenile Protection Benchbook § 1.04 (2011). The Children’s Justice Initiative directs us to look to the best interests of the child at every step in our process because “from a child’s view, a delay is a delay regardless of the reason.” In re Welfare of J.R., 655 N.W.2d 1, 5 (Minn. 2003); see Minn. Judicial Council,…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re the Welfare of J.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Christenson v. ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. HohenwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In re M.O.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013