Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Stephenson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

The persons appearing here as defend-, ants might be more properly styled respondents. As is already statet!} the proceeding is really in the nature of a special proceeding although it takes the-form of an action. The *92defendants are concerned as beneficiaries under the original trust instrument or under its terms as modified, or both.

The questions presented have been thoroughly and carefully briefed and argued and we can do little more than adopt the work of counsel and indicate the grounds upon which our conclusion rests.

It is well settled that reservations by the settlors of trusts…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barnard v. . GantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Dolan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Carpenter v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Warsco v. Oshkosh Savings & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Martin v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cleveland Trust Co. v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Culver v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Bruner v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Hackley Union National Bank v. FarmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API