Legal Opinion

Bruner v. Department of Revenue

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1973No. 301PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The facts are not in dispute. Henry P. Bruner, a Wisconsin resident, created a revocable trust in which he designated himself as the beneficiary during his lifetime and appointed the Harris Trust & Savings Bank of Chicago, Illinois, as trustee. In 1965, the trust realized capital gains in the amount of $4,659.11 from the sale of stocks, bonds, and securities. These capital gains were retained by the trustee as a part of the trust assets and were not distributed as income. In his 1965 federal income tax return, Henry P. Bruner reported these capital gains pursuant to sec. 676 (a) of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Warsco v. Oshkosh Savings & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State ex rel. Howe v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. P.V.N. Acharya v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  3. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. United States Shoe Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API