REIFEL v. Hershey Estates
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bx
Hoffman, J.,
Appellants contend that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the assured clear distance rule under the evidence presented in the case, and that, therefore, their motion for a new trial should have been granted.
Briefly, the facts are that on December 27, 1968, appellant, Mrs. Reifel, with her two children as passengers, was driving an automobile in a westerly direction on U.S. Route 322 in Derry Township, Dauphin County. Route 322 is a two-lane highway with a posted speed limit of 55 mph. Appellant was traveling at a speed of about 30 mph on the wet highway,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Enfield v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Heffernan v. RosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Casey v. SicilianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Cormican v. MenkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Filer v. FilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Unangst v. WhitehouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Westerman. v. StoutSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Bih-Jing Jeng v. WittersDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Spearing v. StarcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Brown v. SchriverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.