Legal Opinion

Zeppi v. Beach

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 1964No. Civ. 10227PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Robert and Gloria Zeppi, the plaintiffs, were injured in a collision with an automobile driven by Leo Kroger. Kroger was killed in the accident. Plaintiffs filed suit seeking damages from Kroger’s estate, also naming as defendants Osear E. Beach and Charles R. Waugh, maintenance superintendent and maintenance foreman, respectively, in the employ of the State Division of Highways. In addition to alleging negligence on Kroger’s part, the complaint charged that the accident was the direct and proximate result of a dangerous highway condition for which Beach and Waugh were responsible. Recovery…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. ArreolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Walnut Creek Aggregates Co. v. Testing Eng'rs Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Tanguilig v. Neiman Marcus Grp., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Albers v. Greyhound Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Kechter v. City of DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API