Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Van Cleave

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1897No. 7316PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from tbe district court of Cass county. Tried beloiv before Chapman, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

Joshua Van Cleave recovered a judgment against one R. G. Wilson, before a justice of the peace in Cass county, on February 4,1890, for $56, including costs of suit; and an execution was issued on said judgment on the same day, which was returned unsatisfied for the want of property whereon to make a levy. Subsequently, Van Cleave’s attorney filed an affidavit in garnishment under section 244 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and a summons in garnishment was served upon the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, by leaving a certified copy thereof with J. W. Bowker, its station agent at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Edney v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis Erection Co., Inc. v. JorgensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gerdes v. KlindtNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Lee Sapp Leasing, Inc. v. Ciao Caffe & Espresso, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Crawford State Bank v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Davis Erection Co., Inc. v. JorgensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API