Legal Opinion

Crawford State Bank v. Murphy

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1943No. 31515PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

In this case questions of law are presented for decision affecting only Crawford State Bank, plaintiff, appellee, and Continental Oil Company, 'garnishee, appellant. The facts are not disputed. Statutory provisions referred to in this opinion are concededly applicable. Upon consideration thereof, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On February 3, 1942, plaintiff filed its petition in the county court of Dawes county seeking to recover $300 and interest upon a promissory note from defendant L. T. Murphy. The latter was in the county when plaintiff’s petition was filed but departed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tessier v. Lockwood Englehart & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Moore v. StaintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. Mathews v. Smith & CrittendenNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Van CleaveNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Kelsey v. KlabundeNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. Maxim's of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API