Legal Opinion

Lee Sapp Leasing, Inc. v. Ciao Caffe & Espresso, Inc.

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 2002No. A-00-897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hannon, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (Merrill Lynch), garnishee, appeals from the denial of its motion for relief from default judgment that had been entered against it in favor of Lee Sapp Leasing, Inc. (Lee Sapp), the garnishor, after Merrill Lynch failed to answer garnishment interrogatories within the statutory period set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1010(2) (Reissue 1995). We conclude the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion for relief from judgment, because Merrill Lynch filed the motion in term, promptly, with a showing of a meritorious defense.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jarrett v. EichlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. From v. SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Beren Corp. v. SpaderNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. KulaNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Barney v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McClellan v. Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Widtfeldt v. Holt County Board of EqualizationNebraska Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Vesely v. National Travelers Life Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. General Service Bureau, Inc. v. MollerNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Kerr v. Board of Regents of the University of NebraskaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API