Legal Opinion
Bolio v. Malloy
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 3, 1967No. 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C.J.
The complainant has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus. The proceeding is directed against the commissioner of motor vehicles to compel that official to hold a hearing to determine whether the complainant is a proper person for the issuance of a motor vehicle operator’s license.
The petitioner has been twice convicted of operating a motor vehicle in this state while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, in violation of the provisions of 23 V.S.A. §1183. Following the first conviction on January 31, 1962, in the Montpelier Municipal Court, the petitioner’s license to operate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Anderson v. Commissioner of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- State v. MuzzySupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Cedergren v. ClarkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1955
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shell v. BechtoldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. PageSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Aiken v. MalloySupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- McGarry v. CostelloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- Small v. GartleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.