Legal Opinion

Department of Environmental Protection v. Cumberland Coal Resources, LP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 2014No. 4 WAP 2013, 5 WAP 2013PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal by allowance, we consider, inter alia, the scope of the authority of the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) to issue administrative orders under the Bituminous Coal Mine Safety Act.1 For the reasons that follow, we find that the DEP acted within its authority with respect to the orders it issued regarding certain failures to report accidents, but that it improperly issued other orders with respect to requiring fire extinguishers on certain mining vehicles. Thus, we reverse in part, and affirm in part, the order of the Commonwealth Court.

Before we…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n Local Union No. 6Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Snyder Bros., Inc. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Socko, D. v. Mid-Atantic Systems of CPA, Inc. ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Marcellus Shale Coal. v. Dep't of Envtl. Prot. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Timberlake v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. SugarHouse HSP Gaming, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API