Legal Opinion

Socko, D. v. Mid-Atantic Systems of CPA, Inc. Aplt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 2015No. 142 MAP 2014PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal by allowance, we consider an issue of first impression: whether the enforcement of an employment agreement containing a restrictive covenant not to compete, entered into after the commencement of employment, may be challenged by an employee for a lack of consideration, where the agreement, by its express terms, states that the parties “intend to be legally bound,” which language implicates the insulating effect of the Uniform Written Obligations Act (“UWOA”),1 In light of our Commonwealth’s long history of disfavoring restrictive covenants, and the mandate…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Nicholas, J. v. Hofmann, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Capitol Presort Services, LLC v. XL Health Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Amquip Crane Rental, LLC v. Crane & Rig Servs., LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. GemmaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Crump v. MetaSource Acquisitions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API