Legal Opinion
In Re Chase
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 12, 1934No. Patent Appeal 3311PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
Appellant has appealed here from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, which affirmed the decision of the Examiner in rejecting claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10-, 14 to 16,18, 19-, and 21 to 23', after having allowed claims 4, 5, 8,11,17, and 20, of appellant’s application for a patent for division stop mechanism for calculators. The grounds of rejection of said claims by the Examiner and the Board of Appeals is based upon estoppel arising out of s) statement of faets, which is as follows:
The application involved in this appeal was filed…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re ShimerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- In re AlexandersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
3Cited by12 opinions
- International Cellucotton Products Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- In re GreggCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Avery v. ChaseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Application of Harry Louis Yale, Francis Alexander Sowinski and Jack BernsteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- American Cyanamid Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.