Legal Opinion

American Cyanamid Co. v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 1939No. 7158PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia dismissing a bill of complaint after a hearing on the merits. The bill was filed by the appellants under Rev.Stat. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to secure an' order authorizing the appellee Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent to the appellant American Cyanamid Company. The trial court ruled that the plaintiffs were estopped to assert the claims herein because they failed to assert them, under Patent Office Rule 109, in an interference proceeding. The rule…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Cellucotton Products Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  2. Avery v. ChaseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  3. In Re ChaseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  4. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoover Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Meitzner v. MindickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  3. General Motors Corp. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1954
  4. Hoover Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  5. Edgerton v. KingslandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API