Legal Opinion

R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Babbitt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1997No. 96-15732PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

R.T. Vanderbilt Company (“Vanderbilt”) sought an order from the district court directing the Secretary of the Interior (“Secretary”) to continue processing Vanderbilt’s mining patent applications. The district court granted summary judgment for the Secretary. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We AFFIRM, although for somewhat different reasons than those stated by the district court.1

BACKGROUND

General Mining Law Overview

Under the General Mining Act of 1872, 30 U.S.C. §§ 21-54, citizens can enter and use public lands for mining exploration. If valuable…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Salvatore Joseph Marino v. Dan Vasquez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Benson Mining & Smelting Co. v. Alta Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Prymas Vaz v. David NealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Idaho Watersheds Project v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Mt. Emmons Mining Co. v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API