Legal Opinion
Kildare v. Saenz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 24, 2003No. 01-17464PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge.
Linda Kildare (“Kildare”), Jonean Daniel (“Daniel”), Tyrone Bozman (“Bozman”), Edgar Copeland (“Copeland”), Donald Furr (“Furr”), Christopher Boyko (“Boy-ko”) and Harvey Winfield (“Winfield”), (collectively “Appellants”), appeal the district court’s dismissal of their class action suit alleging that California state officials systematically disregard federal regulations when they initially evaluate applications for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”), and that the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) fails to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Marc A. Ukolov v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lorrin Whisnant, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Chudacoff v. University Medical Center of Southern NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Paladin Associates, Inc. v. Montana Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.