Legal Opinion

Duvall v. McLeod

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2001No. CC C940918CV; CA A96226; SC S46779PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKulongoski, J.

This negligence action arose out of a traffic accident. Plaintiff obtained a default judgment against defendant in July 1995, awarding her nearly $70,000 in damages. Defendant then filed a motion under Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure (ORCP) 71 B(l) 1 for relief from that default judgment. The issue on review is whether ORCP 71 B(l), which requires that a motion for relief from default judgment be “accompanied by” a pleading or a motion to dismiss, precluded the trial court from separately accepting the pleading or motion to dismiss after defendant already had tendered the motion for relief.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. McFarlane v. McFarlaneOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Duvall v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Benavente v. ThayerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Ballinger v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Dickey v. RehderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Michael v. PugelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. Much v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API