Legal Opinion

Duvall v. McLeod

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 26, 1999No. C940918CV, CA A96226PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*687HASELTON, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment following a jury trial, assigning error to a pretrial order setting aside a default judgment. ORCP 69 C. Plaintiff asserts, in particular, that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion to set aside the default judgment because that motion was not “accompanied by’ a responsive pleading as required by ORCP 71 B(1). We affirm.

This action arose out of a 1992 auto accident in which defendant negligently rear-ended plaintiffs car. In September 1994, plaintiff filed a complaint, served defendant, and sent a courtesy copy of the complaint to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carter v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lowe v. Institutional Investors TrustOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hackett v. Alco Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Wicks-Snodgrass v. City of ReedsportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. SperryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wood v. James W. Fowler Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Duvall v. McLeodOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Duvall v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API