Legal Opinion

Dickey v. Rehder

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 1, 2010No. CV080473; A140559PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Plaintiff took a default judgment against defendant, and defendant subsequently filed a motion to set it aside pursuant to ORCP 71 B(l). Defendant’s motion, however, was not accompanied by a responsive pleading, as required by that rule and by Duvall v. McLeod, 331 Or 675, 680, 21 P3d 88 (2001). When plaintiff opposed the motion, he brought that defect to the attention of the court and defendant. Defendant then sought to withdraw the defective ORCP 71 B(l) motion so that she could refile one that was fully compliant. The trial court allowed defendant to do that and, after the new motion was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bella v. Aurora Air, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In re Registration of a Foreign Judgment Rendered in a Case Involving LittonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Duvall v. McLeodOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Gilbert v. Stancorp Financial Group Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. In re the Marriage of KachaturianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Michael v. PugelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Much v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API