Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Kern

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

This proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act is brought on behalf of persons on the eligible list of typewriter-bookkeeper grade 3 to command the municipal civil service commission to refrain from making any further provisional appointments to the position of typewriter-bookkeeper grade 3, to dismiss all provisional appointees performing the duties of that office, and to certify for appointment at $1,800 per annum the petitioner and other persons on the grade 3 eligible list.

That list was promulgated as a result of an examination held in 1936 for the position of “…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Ryan v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Rushford v. LaGuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nickels v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Stohl v. HorstmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Ryan v. AdlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  4. Prendergast v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Friedman v. KernNew York Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API