Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Kern

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeary, J.

This is a proceeding instituted by the petitioner and members of bis association pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, in which a peremptory order is sought directing the respondents to refrain from making further provisional appointments to the position of typewriter-bookkeeper, grade 3, to dismiss all provisional appointees performing the duties of that position and to certify the petitioner and others similarly situated for appointment to the position of typewriter-bookkeeper, grade 3, at $1,800 per annum, the minimum salary. The petitioner heretofore applied for this relief on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Rushford v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Friedman v. KernNew York Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGovern v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  2. Friedman v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API