Stone v. Southwest Suburban Sewer District
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Cox, A.C.J.
RCW 35.91.020 provides that a sewer district and certain other municipalities may contract with owners of real estate for the construction of water or sewer facilities to serve the area of the owners’ real estate. The statute further provides that such municipalities may provide for the reimbursement of the owners who construct such facilities by any owner of real estate who did not contribute to the original cost of the facilities and who subsequently taps onto them (latecomers). The measure of the reimbursement by latecomers is the “fair pro rata share of the cost of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Rettkowski v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Morgan v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Morgan v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Allan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lakeside Industries v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- R & G Probst v. Dept. of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- R&G Probst v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Badgley Mullins Turner, Pllc App./x-resp. v. Leslie Spencer & Tammy S., Blakey, Resp./x-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Lakeside Industries v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.