Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1999No. 66170-7PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

We decide in this case if the intoxication defense established in RCW 5.40.060 applies to an intentional tort. Under the plain language of that statute, the defense may be asserted only where plaintiff was intoxicated at the time of the occurrence which caused the plaintiffs injuries or death, the intoxication was a proximate cause of the injuries or death, and the plaintiff was more than 50 percent at fault. In utilizing “fault,” a term of art under RCW 4.22.015, the Legislature plainly meant the intoxication defense is unavailable in intentional tort actions. We reverse the judgment on the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Blair v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Rettkowski v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. American Legion Post No. 32 v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. West v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Morgan v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McGee Guest Home, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. McGee Guest Home v. Department of Social and Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2000

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API