Legal Opinion

McCanless v. . Flinchum

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Civil ACTION tried before Gilmer, Judge, at August Term, 1887, of Stokes Superior Court. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner in fee and entitled to the possession of the land decribed therein, and that the defendants unlawfully withheld the possession from him. The answer denies 'the allegations of the complaint, and asserts that the defendants are “in truth and fact owners in fee simple of said land.”

Read the full summary

Civil ACTION tried before Gilmer, Judge, at August Term, 1887, of Stokes Superior Court. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner in fee and entitled to the possession of the land decribed therein, and that the defendants unlawfully withheld the possession from him. The answer denies 'the allegations of the complaint, and asserts that the defendants are “in truth and fact owners in fee simple of said land.” The record sets out that “at August Term, 1887, the case came on for hearing before his Honor, Judge GilMER, and a jury upon the following issues; “1st. Is the plaintiff the…

1Opinion of the Court

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner in fee and entitled to the possession of the land described therein, and that the defendants unlawfully withheld the possession from him.

The answer denies the allegations of the complaint, and asserts that the defendants are "in truth and fact owners in fee simple of said land."

The record sets out that "at August Term, 1887, the case came on for hearing before his Honor, Gilmer, J., and a jury upon the following issues:

"1. Is the plaintiff the owner and entitled to the lands sued for?
"Answer: . . .
"2. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brown v. . KinseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Crummen v. . BennetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  3. Citizens' National Bank v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. Turrentine v. . Richmond Davidson RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Gheen v. . SummeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Long v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. . McKnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Weir v. . WeirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. State ex rel. Brown v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Moore v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API