Legal Opinion
Junho Hyon v. Selten
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 2007No. B188665PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTHSCHILD, J.
Eric Selten appeals from the summary judgment entered against him on his cross-complaint against Junho Hyon. The trial court granted summary judgment on the ground that all of Selten’s claims were based upon a contract that was illegal in part, and that the illegal portions of the contract could not be severed. We agree that the contract was illegal in part and that the illegal portions cannot be severed, but we conclude that Selten should nonetheless be permitted to pursue his common count for the reasonable value of any lawful services rendered. We therefore reverse in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Moeller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Keene v. HarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marathon Entertainment, Inc. v. BlasiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Fair v. BakhtiariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Duchrow v. ForrestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Kandel v. Brother International Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.