Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Vanlue

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1891No. 14,662PublishedCited by 34 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The appellee recovered judgment upon a policy of insurance issued to him by the appellant, and from that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The first question for our decision is whether there was ■such an encumbrance upon the property insured as avoided the policy. The words of the policy are sufficiently comprehensive to include all liens that constitute encumbrances in a legal sense, and if such an encumbrance exists the action must fail, for it is unquestionably the law that a legal -encumbrance will defeat the assured, where it is created or .suffered in violation of the terms of the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Hough v. City Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  4. Havens v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Merrill v. . Agricultural Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Jenkins v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Read & Traversy v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Ebbeskotte v. TylerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API