Continental Insurance v. Vanlue
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Howard Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— The appellee recovered judgment upon a policy of insurance issued to him by the appellant, and from that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
The first question for our decision is whether there was ■such an encumbrance upon the property insured as avoided the policy. The words of the policy are sufficiently comprehensive to include all liens that constitute encumbrances in a legal sense, and if such an encumbrance exists the action must fail, for it is unquestionably the law that a legal -encumbrance will defeat the assured, where it is created or .suffered in violation of the terms of the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hough v. City Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
- Havens v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Merrill v. . Agricultural Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Jenkins v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Read & Traversy v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Ebbeskotte v. TylerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.