Legal Opinion
Matthys v. Barrick Gold of North America, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 13, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00034Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 BRUCE MATTHYS, Case No. 3:20-CV-00034-LRH-CLB 5 ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND Plaintiff, DENYING, IN PART, JOINT MOTION 6 v. REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE 7 BARRICK GOLD OF NORTH AMERICA, [ECF No. 45] INC., et al., 8 9 Defendants. 10 11 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Bruce Matthys (“Matthys”) and Defendant 12 Barrick Turquoise Ridge, Inc.’s (“Barrick”) joint motion regarding discovery dispute. (ECF 13 No. 45.) The discovery dispute relates to a noticed Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. For the 14 reasons discussed below, the joint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & LerachSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Marlyn Sali v. Corona Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Tracinda Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.