People v. McCoy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment, made on the ground that the prosecutor’s questioning of defendant before the grand jury was allegedly improper. The cross-examination at issue was generally appropriate and responsive to defendant’s testimony (see People v Karp, 76 NY2d 1006, 1008 [1990], revg on dissenting op of Sullivan, J., 158 AD2d 378, 385-390 [1990]). In any event, any defects fell far short of impairing the integrity of the proceeding and creating a risk of prejudice (see People v Huston, 88 NY2d 400, 410 [1996]; People v Darby, 75 NY2d 449, 455…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. HustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. DarbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. QuinonesNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. KarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. SterinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. McCoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. McCoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.