People v. Karp
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment reinstated.
We agree with so much of the dissenting opinion of Justice Joseph P. Sullivan (158 AD2d 378, 385) as concluded that the questioning of the defendant before the Grand Jury was neither "overly vigorous” nor prevented the defendant from "fully and fairly testifying” (see, CPL 190.50 [5]).
Inasmuch as the Supreme Court dismissal of the indictment was solely on the ground of the prosecutor’s improper questioning of the defendant, the Appellate Division lacked the power to consider…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. GoodfriendNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. KarpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by49 opinions
- Angel Claudio v. Charles Scully, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- People v. ScerboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. PonnapulaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.