Legal Opinion

Kennett v. Bayada Home Health Care, Inc.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 24, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-cv-02005-CMA-MJWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1234ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, United States District Judge

This case concerns the scope of the so-called “companion” exemption to Colorado state law’s overtime protections. In particular, it requires the Court to decide whether the exemption — which applies to workers who provide home health care' services for the elderly, ill, or disabled — applies solely to those workers who are hired directly by home care recipients and their families, or if the exemption also encompasses the employees…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Maxim Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. Combs v. Jaguar Energy Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016
  3. Murphy v. Allstaff Medical Resources, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API