Legal Opinion

Bradford K. Isley v. Arizona Department of Corrections Terry L. Stewart Jeff Hood Arizona Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 15, 2004No. 03-15858PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge:

Arizona state prisoner Bradford K. Isley appeals the district court’s dismissal as untimely of his 28 U.S.C. § 2244 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), state prisoners must file any petition for federal post-conviction relief within one year of the date that the state court judgment against them became final. 28 U.S.C. *1055§ 2244(d)(1)(A). The AEDPA one year limitation period is tolled so long as “a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review” is “pending.” 28…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Voravongsa v. WallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  4. William P. Ellzey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Hemmerle v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Marilyn Gene Summers v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, Warden Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Canez v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
  4. Hess v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
  5. Van Norman v. SchriroDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API