Legal Opinion
Voravongsa v. Wall
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 12, 2003No. 02-1606PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILER, Senior Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we are asked to decide one question of law: whether petitioner Lamphone Voravongsa’s 1 pro se motion for appointment of state post-conviction counsel constitutes a “properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2), as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 110 Stat. 1214, thereby tolling the one-year period of limitations that would otherwise bar review of Voravongsa’s federal habeas…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Tafford Lee Holman, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jerry D. Gilmore, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Lookingbill v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- George Everette Sibley, Jr. v. Grantt CulliverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Ciampi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Blue v. MedeirosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Bradford K. Isley v. Arizona Department of Corrections Terry L. Stewart Jeff Hood Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Jesse James Jackson v. John F. AultCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.