Legal Opinion

Indiana Civil Rights Commission v. Wellington Village Apartments

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1992No. 49A02-9102-CV-92PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIELDS, Judge.

William E. Barron (Barron) and the Indiana Civil Rights Commission (Commission) seek appellate review of the trial court's judgment in favor of Wellington Village Apartments (Wellington) and Nottingham Village Apartments (Nottingham).

We affirm as to Nottingham and affirm in part and reverse in part as to Wellington.

ISSUES

1. Whether the trial court erred in finding the Commission's decision is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and without observance of procedure required by law in that:

a. the Commission's findings of fact are based upon answers to requests for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Indiana Civil Rights Commission v. HolmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Indiana Department of Correction v. Indiana Civil Rights CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Indiana Civil Rights Commission v. Midwest Steel Division of National Steel Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Indiana Civil Rights Commission v. AlderIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Indiana Civil Rights Commission v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Corby v. SwankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Indiana Family & Social Services Administration v. PickettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Filter Specialists, Inc. v. BrooksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API