Legal Opinion

Fox v. Milwaukee Mechanics' Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

A consideration of the questions raised on this appeal requires us to set out the following portions of the Wisconsin standard fire insurance policy:

Sec. 203.01. . . . “In consideration of the stipulations herein named and of-dollars premium does insure- - and legal representatives, to the extent of the actual cash value (ascertained with proper deductions for depreciation) of the property at the time of loss or damage.”

Sec. 203.21, ordinarily known as the Wisconsin valued policy law, provides:

“Whenever any policy of insurance is written to insure real property and the property insured is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Schlesinger v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. ReddingSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  4. Reilly v. Franklin Insurance Co. of St. LouisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Eck v. Netherlands InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ciokewicz v. Lynn Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Gimbels Midwest, Inc. v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hensley v. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co. of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Gambrell v. Campbellsport Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API