Legal Opinion

Eck v. Netherlands Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

In the view the court takes o.f this matter it is not necessary to consider the sufficiency or validity of the proceedings for an appraisal. If there is evidence in the record to sustain the conclusion of.the trial court that there was a total loss by fire, within.the meaning of sec. 203.21, Stats., then the provisions of that section apply, and the amount of the insurance written in the policy is to be taken as the true value of the property when insured, and the true measure of damages when destroyed, and the provisions in the policy for an appraisal are inoperative and the proceedings of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamburg-Bremen Fire Insurance v. GarlingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Seyk v. Millers' National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Trustees of St. Clara Female Academy of Sinsinawa Mound v. Northwestern National Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Lindner v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Oshkosh Packing & Provision Co. v. Mercantile Ins. Co. of MobileU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ciokewicz v. Lynn Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gambrell v. Campbellsport Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Fox v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Meccage v. Spartan Insurance CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API