Carter v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the postconviction court’s denial of relief based on his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim. Appellant asserts that his trial counsel made an objectively unreasonable error by failing to challenge the basis for the stop that ultimately led to his arrest and conviction. Because we conclude that the officer had a valid basis for the stop and therefore any challenge to the validity of the stop would have failed, we affirm the postconviction court.
FACTS
On November 5, 2006, Benton County Deputy Garth McFadden stopped a vehicle driven by appellant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013