Legal Opinion

Hamilton Furniture Co. v. Brenard Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 4, 1926No. 6 Div. 729PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is on a series of promissory notes made by defendant to plaintiff. Pleas were in short by consent. The affirmative charge was given for plaintiff.

Defendant signed and submitted through plaintiff’s subagent a combined order and agency contract in writing, saying:

“Upon your approval of this order and agency contract, deliver to me at your earliest convenience, f. o. b. factory or distributing point, the articles mentioned below, in payment for which I herewith hand you my notes aggregating $328, which you are to cancel and return to me if agreement is not approved by you.”

The articles,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shriner v. MeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Smith & Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Bissell Motor Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Miller Bros. v. Direct Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Capitol Lumber Co. v. MullinixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. SampleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Dean v. LydeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Gafford v. TittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Blount County Bank v. Robinett McCayAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Kilgore v. ArantAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API