Hamlin v. Flick
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered June 13, 1923, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a promissory note, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
This is an action brought by H. H. Hamlin, as plaintiff, against Edwin H. Flick and Madeline M. Flick, as defendants, to recover upon a promissory note. The action was. tried by the court sitting without a jury, and resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a sum less than the face value of the note. From the judgment, both parties have appealed.
The note upon which the plaintiff’s cause of action is founded was executed on August 4, 1913. It provided for the payment of $1,850 three years after date, with interest at seven per cent per annum, payable semiannually. It further provided…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buck v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State ex rel. American Freehold-Land Mortgage Co. of London v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Buty v. GoldfinchWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- O'Hanlon Co. v. JessMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Hamlin v. HamlinWashington Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peoples National Bank v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Evans v. Yakima Valley, Grape Growers Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Diettrich Bros., Inc. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Hagerty v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1959
- Tonkon v. SmallWashington Supreme Court · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.