Legal Opinion

Clark v. Woody

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 5, 1944No. 14822PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer of Ernest Harkins, as administrator. This suit was instituted by certain heirs at law. The petition shows on its face that there is an administrator of this estate. “Under the provisions of the Code of this State, before, heirs at law of a deceased intestate can recover land which had belonged to the estate of such intestate, they must allege and prove that there was no administration on the estate, or that the administrator, if there was one, assented to their bringing suit.”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Anderson v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Doris v. StorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Gornto v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Wilson v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Butler v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  3. Thornton v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Gay v. RadfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Williams v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API