Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Bowman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1949No. 16801PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Heap, Justice.

If there is a legal representative of an estate, the right to recover realty is in such legal representative; and if there is none, the heirs may sue in their own name. Code, § 113-901. Upon the appointment of an administrator, the right to recover possession of the estate from third persons is solely in him; but if there is no administrator, or if the administrator consents, the heirs may recover realty fir their own name. § 113-907. It is the general rule in Georgia that, before heirs at law of an intestate can recover land, they must allege and prove that there is no…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Flannery & Co. v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Greenfield v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Doris v. StorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Benton v. TurkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Crummey v. BentleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harrison v. HolsenbeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Johns v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  4. Julian v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Williams v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API