Legal Opinion

Ratcliff v. Myers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1955No. Appeals, 83 and 84PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

In these proceedings, initially instituted to recover damages arising from a right angle collision between two automobiles, the verdict of the jury has brought about an illogical and therefore untenable result.

At about eleven o’clock in the morning of a clear March day, one Lawrence Yost was driving a Packard car south on Highway Route 194 in the Borough of East Berlin, Adams County. At the same time one Sterling Myers was operating a Chevrolet car west on Highway Route 234 in that Borough. The two cars collided at the intersection of these two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Lewis v. QuinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Trerotola v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. TONSIC Et Vir. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Greenberg v. StanleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Riesberg v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Cason v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API