Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. Boston Scientific Corp.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided October 9, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-08633PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

(Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Punitive Damages Claims and Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint)

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge.

Pending before the court are (1) Boston Scientific Corporation’s (“BSC”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Punitive Damages Claims [Docket 263];1 and (2) plaintiff Chris Rene Wilson’s Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint [Docket 167]. For the reasons below, I FIND that West Virginia law, not Massachusetts law, applies to plaintiffs’ punitive damages claims and that there are…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. BardonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2023
  2. Goodnight v. Boston Scientific CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API