Chicago & Michigan Lake Shore R. R. v. Hughes
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
The defendant in error having sued the company in thp circuit court for Berrien county upon certain claims he made against them for services and commissions, the parties regularly submitted their controversy to arbitrators, pursuant to chapter 217 of the Compiled Laws of 1871, and agreed that the court should render judgment upon the award that should be made.
The submission so made embraced three demands by the defendant in error, namely:
First. Eor commissions (salary) earned by him as express agent at St. Joseph, from the 21st of February, 1870, to the 7th of February, 1871, and turned in by…
2Cited by14 opinions
- McKinstry v. Valley Obstetrics-Gynecology Clinic, PCMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Heurtebise v. Reliable Business Computers, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Sebree v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- Stadel v. Granger Brothers, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- George W. Riley and Goldie I. Riley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.