Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 17, 2003No. 97C-10933; A119237Published

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiff Sharon McFarland appeals a judgment awarding her overtime compensation from the state, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding an approximately four-month period of employment. We affirm.

This is one of several appeals that have arisen in the wake of the remand to the circuit court of Young v. State of Oregon, 161 Or App 32, 983 P2d 1044, rev den, 329 Or 447 (1999) (Young I). Plaintiff David Young initiated a class action seeking a declaration that he and other current and former state executive, administrative, supervisory, and professional employees are entitled to overtime…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API