Legal Opinion
Dickerson v. International United Auto Workers Union
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1994No. Nos. 65513 and 65543PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
James M. Porter, Judge.
Defendants-appellants the International United Auto Workers Union (the “International”) and United Auto Workers Local 2262 (“Local”) appeal from jury verdicts and judgments in favor of four union members in the aggregate sum of $1.78 million. The plaintiffs recovered for intentional infliction of emotional distress allegedly caused by various union officials and members who intimidated and threatened the plaintiffs because they crossed the picket line and worked during a strike.
Defendant unions claim that the threats and intimidation were federally’ protected free…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Meyers v. Hot Bagels Factory, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bragg v. MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Abel v. Auglaize County Highway DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Valente v. UNIVERSITY OF DAYTONDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Anthony v. United Telephone Co. of OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.